Kingdom of the Netherlands, represented, in Case TвЂ‘208/11, initially by M.В Bulterman, N.В Noort andВ C.В Schillemans, and subsequently, as well as in Case TвЂ‘508/11, by C.В Wissels, M.В Bulterman and J.В Langer, acting as Agents, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), established in Herning (Denmark), represented by V.В Koppe, A.В M.В van Eik and T.В Buruma, lawyers,Д¬ouncil of the European Union, represented by G.В Г‰tienne and E.В Finnegan, acting as Agents, вЂ›Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) NoВ 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a third State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority for the purpose of Common Position 2001/931вЂ™ JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.Д¬ommon foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) NoВ 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.Дigital reports (Court Reports - general) Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16В October 2014.

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16В October 2014.#Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) NoВ 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.#Joined Cases TвЂ‘208/11 and TвЂ‘508/11.